dynamicbydesign on Bioluminescence is difficult f… Andrew Smith on Bioluminescence is difficult f…
Eloquence is evidence enough of a Master’s touch. We can see eloquence in the constrained fluidity of the genetic code. Here we can find evidence of a new kind of POSADA: Programmed Ontogeny through Self-Adjusting Dynamic Architecture. Clear examples of … Continue reading
I don’t really fit in the “evolutionist” or the “creationist” camps. I am closer to Wallace’s notion of “intelligent evolution” than the Intelligent Design proponents who are working from a devolution framework. I am a Dynamic Oscillationist.
> Materialists advocate for evolution. Fundamentalists argue for devolution. They are both partly right and partly wrong. The vanguard of 21st century biology will focus on the elastic elipsoidal nature of speciation through natural selection. We can see evidence of … Continue reading
It is not so much that Charles Darwin was wrong in his theory of evolution, rather that it was incomplete. In future years, his conceptualizations will be augmented by studies in the area of ellipsisation; the studies of the parabolic … Continue reading